[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151117074431.01338392@lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:44:31 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
Cc: Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula <danilo.cesar@...labora.co.uk>,
LMML <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] scripts/kernel-doc: Replacing highlights hash by
an array
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 08:40:46 -0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com> wrote:
> The above causes some versions of perl to fail, as keys expect a
> hash argument:
>
> Execution of .//scripts/kernel-doc aborted due to compilation errors.
> Type of arg 1 to keys must be hash (not private array) at .//scripts/kernel-doc line 2714, near "@highlights) "
>
> This is happening at linuxtv.org server, with runs perl version 5.10.1.
OK, that's not good. But I'm not quite sure what to do about it.
Perl 5.10.1 is a little over six years old. Nobody else has complained
(yet) about this problem. So it might be best to "fix" this with a
minimum version added to the Changes file.
Or maybe we need to revert the patch.
So I'm far from a Perl expert, so I have no clue what the minimum version
would be if we were to say "5.10.1 is too old." I don't suppose anybody
out there knows?
Thanks,
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists