lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564B4C36.2000004@collabora.co.uk>
Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:48:06 -0200
From:	Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula <danilo.cesar@...labora.co.uk>
To:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:	LMML <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] scripts/kernel-doc: Replacing highlights hash by
 an array


On 17-11-2015 13:29, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:44:31 -0700
> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:
> 
>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 08:40:46 -0200
>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The above causes some versions of perl to fail, as keys expect a
>>> hash argument:
>>>
>>> Execution of .//scripts/kernel-doc aborted due to compilation errors.
>>> Type of arg 1 to keys must be hash (not private array) at .//scripts/kernel-doc line 2714, near "@highlights) "
>>>
>>> This is happening at linuxtv.org server, with runs perl version 5.10.1.
>>
>> OK, that's not good.  But I'm not quite sure what to do about it.
>>
>> Perl 5.10.1 is a little over six years old.  Nobody else has complained
>> (yet) about this problem.  So it might be best to "fix" this with a
>> minimum version added to the Changes file.
>>
>> Or maybe we need to revert the patch.
>>
>> So I'm far from a Perl expert, so I have no clue what the minimum version
>> would be if we were to say "5.10.1 is too old."  I don't suppose anybody
>> out there knows?
> 
> I'm also not a Perl expert, and never saw before the usage of "keys" on
> an array. Yet, according with:
> 	http://perldoc.perl.org/functions/keys.html
> 
> "in Perl 5.12 or later only, the indices of an array"
> 
> If so, then maybe we could replace:
> 	foreach my $k (keys @highlights)
> 
> by a more C style variant, with all versions of perl 5:
> 	for (my $k = 0; $k < @highlights; $k++) {
> 
> The enclosed patch should do the trick. I tested it with perl 5.10 and 
> perl 5.22 it worked fine with both versions.

I'm Not a perl guru myself either =/.

But thanks for fixing it Mauro!

Danilo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ