[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564A978A.8060905@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:57:14 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] timer: relax tick stop in idle entry
On 11/16/2015 6:53 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Fair point. When in the five-jiffy throttling state, what can wake up
> a CPU? In an earlier version of this proposal, the answer was "nothing",
> but maybe that has changed.
device interrupts are likely to wake the cpus.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists