lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151117.121021.367627373283927784.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:10:21 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, julia.lawall@...6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net-scm: Delete an unnecessary check before the
 function call "kfree"

From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:43:35 +0100

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:37:22 +0100
> 
> The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>

STOP submitting this crap, NOW!

I told you I won't review nor apply these patches any more.

And ever worse, this one is BUGGY.

We're testing p->fp so we know if we can safely dereference
it or not.

You're adding an OOPS to the kernel.

This is why these mindless mechanical transformations are not
only often a waste of time, they are dangerous as well.

I am silently rejecting from patchwork, immediately, any and all
patches you submit of this nature.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ