[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151117171236.GJ30101@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:12:37 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
kernel-build-reports@...ts.linaro.org, olof@...om.net,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117)
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:03:40PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 November 2015 16:44:53 Will Deacon wrote:
> > > 8<----
> > > Subject: ARM64: make smp_load_acquire() work with const arguments
> > >
> > > smp_load_acquire() uses typeof() to declare a local variable for temporarily
> > > storing the output of the memory access. This fails when the argument is
> > > constant, because the assembler complains about using a constant register
> > > as output:
> > >
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:71:3: error: read-only variable '___p1'
> > > used as 'asm' output
> >
> > Do you know the usage in the kernel causing this warning?
>
> A newly introduced function in include/net/sock.h:
>
> static inline int sk_state_load(const struct sock *sk)
> {
> return smp_load_acquire(&sk->sk_state);
> }
Hmm, maybe we could play a similar trick to READ_ONCE by declaring an
anonymous union and writing through the non-const member?
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists