[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564B60EC.3050106@sandisk.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:16:28 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
CC: <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <sagig@....mellanox.co.il>,
<axboe@...com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] move blk_iopoll to limit and make it generally
available
On 11/13/2015 11:02 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:19:24AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 11/13/2015 05:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> The new name is irq_poll as iopoll is already taken. Better suggestions
>>> welcome.
>>
>> Would it be possible to provide more background information about this ?
>> Which other kernel subsystem is using the name iopoll ?
>
> Take a look at include/linux/iopoll.h - I can't reaplly make much sense
> of it to be honest, but it's used in a quite a few places.
How about renaming blk_iopoll into blk_poll ? That way the name still
refers to the block layer. And although the current implementation
performs polling from IRQ context future implementations maybe will
allow polling from thread context.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists