linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] brcmnand: Clear EXT_ADDR error registers in PIO mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:55:15 -0800
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmnand: Clear EXT_ADDR error registers in PIO mode

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 07:41:21AM +0000, Simon Arlott wrote:
> On 17/11/15 00:40, Brian Norris wrote:
> > + bcm-kernel-feedback-list
> > 
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:05:39PM +0000, Simon Arlott wrote:
> >> If an error occurs in flash above 4GB in PIO mode then the EXT_ADDR
> >> registers will be set to the location of the error and never cleared.
> >> 
> >> Reset them to 0 before reading.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
> > 
> > Patch looks OK. Did you see this problem in practice, or is this just
> > theoretical? I thought the documentation seemed to suggest these
> > registers were cleared together with their non-_EXT counterparts. But
> > implementation definitely trumps documentation for HW.
> 
> It's theoretical (I don't have 4GB+ flash), but the Broadcom version of
> the NAND driver does this.

That's a funny thing to say :) There never really was a single "Broadcom
version" until we settled on upstreaming this one. It's a direct
descendant of this [1], which also does not do these writes, and was
tested on >4GB flash, though not extensively.

Which product line did you get your driver from, then?

Anyway, unless someone still at Broadcom can confirm or deny, I suppose
this patch is mostly harmless and I can take it.

Brian

> > Brian
> > 
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 2 ++
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> >> index 12c6190..2c8f67f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> >> @@ -1400,6 +1400,8 @@ static int brcmnand_read_by_pio(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> >>  	/* Clear error addresses */
> >>  	brcmnand_write_reg(ctrl, BRCMNAND_UNCORR_ADDR, 0);
> >>  	brcmnand_write_reg(ctrl, BRCMNAND_CORR_ADDR, 0);
> >> +	brcmnand_write_reg(ctrl, BRCMNAND_UNCORR_EXT_ADDR, 0);
> >> +	brcmnand_write_reg(ctrl, BRCMNAND_CORR_EXT_ADDR, 0);
> >>  
> >>  	brcmnand_write_reg(ctrl, BRCMNAND_CMD_EXT_ADDRESS,
> >>  			(host->cs << 16) | ((addr >> 32) & 0xffff));
> >> -- 
> >> 2.1.4
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Simon Arlott
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Simon Arlott

[1] https://github.com/Broadcom/stblinux-3.8/blob/master/linux/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmstb_nand.c
    Disclaimer: I used to work at Broadcom.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/