[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2858640.EtAPBOce2G@jclayton-pc>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:58:54 -0800
From: Joshua Clayton <stillcompiling@...il.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Adrian Remonda <adrianremonda@...il.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c: use one rx buffer
On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 05:41:56 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 07:24:21AM -0800, Joshua Clayton wrote:
>
> > default_rx and rx are needlessly different.
> > Use one buffer, local to transmit()
>
> Why? This isn't what I'd expect from black boxing the API, from a
> userspace point of view the transfer is atomic and in an ideal world
> we'd be able to do direct to/from memory transfers rather than memcpy()
> into kernel space which means that userspace should assume the transfers
> are going on simultaneously even if they don't currently.
The important thing here was to get rid of the default_rx buffer.
I just noticed that the output can be set up completely within the scope
of the transmit function, since the operands are global. But I would be
just as happy to set it up at the top level. I'll change this in V2
--
~Joshua Clayton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists