lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:13:14 +0900 From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: use resource_size_t to store physical address Dear, Arnd. On 11/13/2015 06:35 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 13 November 2015 03:10:13 Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote: >>> The dw_mmc driver stores the physical address of the MMIO registers >>> in a pointer, which requires the use of type casts, and is actually >>> broken if anyone ever has this device on a 32-bit SoC in registers >>> above 4GB. Gcc warns about this possibility when the driver is built >>> with ARM LPAE enabled: >> >>> - host->phy_regs = (void *)(regs->start); >>> + host->phy_regs = regs->start; >> >>> /* Set external dma config: burst size, burst width */ >>> - cfg.dst_addr = (dma_addr_t)(host->phy_regs + fifo_offset); >>> + cfg.dst_addr = host->phy_regs + fifo_offset; >> >> dst_addr is dma_addr_t? > > Sort of. It doesn't really fit into any of the categories, and we actually > had a patch to change the type in the past, see > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/10/167. Not sure what is going on there. why isn't the patch applied on mainline yet? :) Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > >>> /* Registers's physical base address */ >>> - void *phy_regs; >>> + resource_size_t phy_regs; >> >> If dst_addr is dma_addr_t wouldn't be a problem when >> resource_size_t is defined as 64-bit address, and dma_addr_t as 32-bit? >> >> Btw, for me casting to dma_addr_t looks sane. > > The background here is that the address comes from a resource_size_t > that describes the MMIO register area as seen from the CPU, and that > is normally a phys_addr_t (resource_size_t is defined as being long > enough to store a phys_addr_t or various other things depending on > resource->flags). > > dma_addr_t strictly speaking refers to a RAM location as seen by a > DMA master, and that only comes out of dma_map_*() or > dma_alloc_coherent(). > > The DMA engine wants something else here, which is an MMIO register > address as seen by a DMA master, and we don't have a separate typedef > for that. Almost universally all of resource_size_t, phys_addr_t and > dma_addr_t are the same type, and if we ever get a platform that > wants something other than a phys_addr_t to put into cfg.dst_addr, > we are in deep trouble. > > Arnd > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists