linux-kernel - [PATCH perf/core 05/13] perf: Fix machine__findnew_module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151118064020.30709.40499.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:40:20 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH perf/core 05/13] perf: Fix machine__findnew_module_map to
 put registered map

Fix machine object to put the map object which is already
insterted to machine->kmaps.

refcnt debugger shows what happened:
  ----
  ==== [2] ====
  Unreclaimed map: 0x346f750
  Refcount +1 => 1 at
    ./perf(map__new2+0xb5) [0x4bdea5]
    ./perf() [0x4b8aaf]
    ./perf(modules__parse+0xfc) [0x4a9cbc]
    ./perf() [0x4b83c0]
    ./perf(machine__create_kernel_maps+0x148) [0x4bb208]
    ./perf(machine__new_host+0xfa) [0x4bb3fa]
    ./perf(init_probe_symbol_maps+0x93) [0x5062b3]
    ./perf() [0x455ffa]
    ./perf(cmd_probe+0x6c) [0x4566bc]
    ./perf() [0x47abc5]
    ./perf(main+0x610) [0x421f90]
    /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f5373899af5]
    ./perf() [0x4220a9]
  Refcount +1 => 2 at
    ./perf(maps__insert+0x9a) [0x4bfd4a]
    ./perf() [0x4b8acb]
    ./perf(modules__parse+0xfc) [0x4a9cbc]
    ./perf() [0x4b83c0]
    ./perf(machine__create_kernel_maps+0x148) [0x4bb208]
    ./perf(machine__new_host+0xfa) [0x4bb3fa]
    ./perf(init_probe_symbol_maps+0x93) [0x5062b3]
    ./perf() [0x455ffa]
    ./perf(cmd_probe+0x6c) [0x4566bc]
    ./perf() [0x47abc5]
    ./perf(main+0x610) [0x421f90]
    /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f5373899af5]
    ./perf() [0x4220a9]
  Refcount -1 => 1 at
    ./perf(map_groups__exit+0x94) [0x4bea54]
    ./perf(machine__delete+0x3d) [0x4b91ed]
    ./perf(exit_probe_symbol_maps+0x28) [0x506358]
    ./perf() [0x45628a]
    ./perf(cmd_probe+0x6c) [0x4566bc]
    ./perf() [0x47abc5]
    ./perf(main+0x610) [0x421f90]
    /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f5373899af5]
    ./perf() [0x4220a9]
  ----
This pattern clearly shows that the refcnt of the map is acquired
twice ny map__new2 and maps__insert but released once at map_groups_exit.
Since maps__insert already got the dso, we have to put it right
after that which corresponding to the map__new2.

These are happened in machine__findnew_module_map, as below.
  ----
  # eu-addr2line -e ./perf -f 0x4b8aaf
  machine__findnew_module_map inlined at util/machine.c:1046
  in machine__create_module
  util/machine.c:582
  # eu-addr2line -e ./perf -f 0x4b8acb
  map_groups__insert inlined at util/machine.c:585
  in machine__create_module
  util/map.h:208
  ----
(note that both are at util/machine.c:58X which is
 machine__findnew_module_map)
So, this patch fixes machine__findnew_module_map to put the map
right after map_groups__insert.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/machine.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
index 5ef90be..5ca4064 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
@@ -584,6 +584,8 @@ struct map *machine__findnew_module_map(struct machine *machine, u64 start,
 
 	map_groups__insert(&machine->kmaps, map);
 
+	/* Put the map here because map_groups__insert alread got it */
+	map__put(map);
 out:
 	free(m.name);
 	return map;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/