linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:33:57 +0000
From:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
CC:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>, jlbec@...lplan.org,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	lars@...afoo.de, knaack.h@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	octavian.purdila@...el.com, pebolle@...cali.nl,
	patrick.porlan@...el.com, adriana.reus@...el.com,
	constantin.musca@...el.com, marten@...uitiveaerial.com,
	cristina.opriceana@...il.com, pmeerw@...erw.net,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation



On 17 November 2015 23:47:16 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:39:08 +0000 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
>wrote:
>
>> On 11/11/15 06:43, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On 10 November 2015 21:12:37 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton
><akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> is this simple addition something you could still send on to
>Linus
>> >>> for this merge window?  I would make my life easier to have it in
>> >>> so I could start using it in patches for various trees in the
>next
>> >>> merge window.
>> >>
>> >> It's super late, but the configfs changes are obviously safe to
>> >> existing code.
>> >>
>> >> What about the IIO changes?  Will someone be merging them for
>4.5-rc1,
>> >> or something else?
>> > Yes. I'll take the IIO bits and ultimately they'll go through Greg
>KH for the 4.5 
>> > merge window.
>> > 
>> Hi Andrew,
>> 
>> Just taken a quick look at your mmotm list and see this ended up in
>the
>> mainline later group (fair enough given the timing!).
>> As such shall we fall back to plan b) a special git branch pulled
>into the trees
>> of anyone who cares?
>> 
>> I'll base such a tree on some obvious point in Linus' tree (either
>4.4 or 4.5-rc1)
>> That way I can get the IIO stuff queued up asap and we can build on
>that going
>> forward during this cycle.
>
>I plan to send configfs-allow-dynamic-group-creation.patch to Linus
>this week.  I'll retain 
>
>iio-core-introduce-iio-configfs-support.patch
>iio-core-introduce-iio-software-triggers.patch
>iio-core-introduce-iio-software-triggers-fix.patch
>iio-trigger-introduce-iio-hrtimer-based-trigger.patch
>iio-documentation-add-iio-configfs-documentation.patch
>
>with a view to dropping them once I see them turn up in linux-next.

That's great. Thanks.

Jonathan

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/