[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151118075431.GB5416@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:54:31 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: Add callchain order support for
libunwind DWARF unwinder
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:13:08PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote:
SNIP
> 3.38% a.out a.out [.] funcc
> |
> ---funcc
> |
> |--2.70%-- funcb
> | funca
> | main
> | __libc_start_main
> | _start
> |
> --0.68%-- 0
>
>
> I'm not sure whether we can regard this behavior changing as a bugfix? I
> think
> there may be some reason the original code explicitly avoid creating an '0'
> entry.
>
> Then I tried to find why perf can't get call frame on my case, and
> I guess there's something wrong whe dealing with 'call' command, because
> the instruction on it I can't get callchain from libunwind is a 'callq':
>
> ...
> 4005bf: be 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%esi
> 4005c4: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi
> 4005c7: e8 74 fe ff ff callq 400440 <gettimeofday@plt>
> us2 = tv2.tv_sec * 1000000 + tv2.tv_usec;
> 4005cc: 48 8b 04 24 mov (%rsp),%rax
> ...
>
> But this is another problem, we can discuss it in a new thread.
so the problem is you dont see the gettimeofday call at the end?
could you share the test code?
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists