lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151117165251.ccfe80f7007dfc3d0f346cd7@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2015 16:52:51 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Piotr Kwapulinski <kwapulinski.piotr@...il.com>
Cc:	mhocko@...e.com, oleg@...hat.com, cmetcalf@...hip.com,
	mszeredi@...e.cz, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, dave@...olabs.net,
	kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
	aarcange@...hat.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, jack@...e.cz,
	xiexiuqi@...wei.com, vbabka@...e.cz, Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com,
	riel@...hat.com, gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: remove incorrect MAP_FIXED flag comparison
 from mmap_region

On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:26:38 +0100 Piotr Kwapulinski <kwapulinski.piotr@...il.com> wrote:

> The following flag comparison in mmap_region is not fully correct:
> 
> if (!(vm_flags & MAP_FIXED))
> 
> The vm_flags should not be compared with MAP_FIXED (0x10). It is a bit
> confusing. This condition is almost always true since VM_MAYREAD (0x10)
> flag is almost always set by default. This patch removes this condition.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -1547,13 +1547,6 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
>  	if (!may_expand_vm(mm, len >> PAGE_SHIFT)) {
>  		unsigned long nr_pages;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * MAP_FIXED may remove pages of mappings that intersects with
> -		 * requested mapping. Account for the pages it would unmap.
> -		 */
> -		if (!(vm_flags & MAP_FIXED))
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> -
>  		nr_pages = count_vma_pages_range(mm, addr, addr + len);
>  
>  		if (!may_expand_vm(mm, (len >> PAGE_SHIFT) - nr_pages))

That looks simpler.

However the changelog doesn't describe the end-user visible effects of
the bug, as changelogs should always do.  Presumably this is causing
incorrect ENOMEM reporting due to RLIMIT_AS being exceeded, but this
isn't very specific.

So can you please fill in the details here?  Such info is needed when
deciding which kernel version(s) need the fix.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ