[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <564BCFC2.8050506@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:09:22 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Timo Sigurdsson <public_timo.s@...entcreek.de>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, javier@....samsung.com, kgene@...nel.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, olof@...om.net, geert+renesas@...der.be,
lee.jones@...aro.org, sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk,
alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
wens@...e.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: sunxi: Re-enable SID driver in multi_v7_defconfig
On 17.11.2015 18:03, Timo Sigurdsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Krzysztof Kozlowski schrieb am 17.11.2015 09:21:
>
> [...]
>
>>>>> @@ -450,8 +431,7 @@ CONFIG_MEDIA_CAMERA_SUPPORT=y
>>>>> CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER=y
>>>>> CONFIG_VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API=y
>>>>> CONFIG_MEDIA_USB_SUPPORT=y
>>>>> -CONFIG_USB_VIDEO_CLASS=y
>>>>> -CONFIG_USB_GSPCA=y
>>>>> +CONFIG_USB_VIDEO_CLASS=m
>>>>> CONFIG_V4L_PLATFORM_DRIVERS=y
>>>>> CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA=m
>>>>> CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA_PLATFORM=m
>>>>> @@ -465,28 +445,25 @@ CONFIG_DRM=y
>>>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7511=m
>>>>> # CONFIG_DRM_I2C_CH7006 is not set
>>>>> # CONFIG_DRM_I2C_SIL164 is not set
>>>>> -CONFIG_DRM_NXP_PTN3460=m
>>>>> -CONFIG_DRM_PARADE_PS8622=m
>>>>> CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=m
>>>>> CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS=m
>>>>> -CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS_DSI=y
>>>>> CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS_FIMD=y
>>>>> -CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS_HDMI=y
>>>>
>>>> I would prefer leaving the EXYNOS_HDMI. Dependencies are now not enabled
>>>> but we are fixing it in:
>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg93299.html
>>>
>>> I think the problem here is that I don't see this patch in linux-next
>>> yet.
>>>
>>
>> Indeed... and I don't know when it will go there so actually maybe it
>> should be removed... but in the same time removing DRM_EXYNOS_HDMI
>> will probably make some conflicts because mentioned patch will go
>> through Exynos DRM tree or Samsung SoC.
>
> Since you suggested to split my patch into two, I might as well just
> hold off the "cleanup" patch until Andrzejs patch hits linux-next.
> Is that ok?
>From my point of view - OK. However this may take time... I don't know
when Andrzej's patch will be applied so for me would work also
savedefconfig without removing HDMI.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists