[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151118154306.GA24719@mail.hallyn.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:43:06 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ABI/API" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LXC development mailing-list
<lxc-devel@...ts.linuxcontainers.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
cgroups mailinglist <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: CGroup Namespaces (v4)
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:18:44AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 04:24:27PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Similary have you considered what it required to be able to safely set
> >> FS_USERNS_MOUNT?
> >
> > I pushed the one patch which I feel is needed to my branch (it's also
> > included in another reply). Aditya had already added FS_USERNS_MOUNT to
> > the cgroup fs flags, so I think we're now all set. I can start
> > unprivileged containers which mount cgroupfs (which make systemd happy).
>
> In principle that sounds very good, and I am glad to see that.
>
> Let's hold off on merging the unprivileged part until everything else is
> reviewed and merged and we have performed an extra hard look at the
> security implications as it can be easy to overlook something when
> relaxing the permissions.
I'll break out the FS_USERNS_MOUNT flag into the very last patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists