[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564CC5DB.8000104@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:39:23 -0800
From: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@...aro.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: initialize m_dirty to avoid compile warning
On 11/18/2015 10:33 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:27:32AM -0800, Shi, Yang wrote:
>>> This was the main reason the code was structured the way it is. If
>>> cgroup writeback is not enabled, any derefs of mdtc variables should
>>> trigger warnings. Ugh... I don't know. Compiler really should be
>>> able to tell this much.
>>
>> Thanks for the explanation. It sounds like a compiler problem.
>>
>> If you think it is still good to cease the compile warning, maybe we could
>
> If this is gonna be a problem with new gcc versions, I don't think we
> have any other options. :(
>
>> just assign it to an insane value as what Andrew suggested, maybe
>> 0xdeadbeef.
>
> I'd just keep it at zero. Whatever we do, the effect is gonna be
> difficult to track down - it's not gonna blow up in an obvious way.
> Can you please add a comment tho explaining that this is to work
> around compiler deficiency?
Sure.
Other than this, in v2, I will just initialize m_dirty since compiler
just reports it is uninitialized.
Thanks,
Yang
>
> Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists