linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/xen: Avoid fast syscall path for Xen PV guests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:50:16 -0500
From:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
	Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/xen: Avoid fast syscall path for Xen PV guests

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Boris Ostrovsky
> <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com> wrote:
>> After 32-bit syscall rewrite, and specifically after commit 5f310f739b4c
>> ("x86/entry/32: Re-implement SYSENTER using the new C path"), the stack
>> frame that is passed to xen_sysexit is no longer a "standard" one (i.e.
>> it's not pt_regs).
>>
>> Since we end up calling xen_iret from xen_sysexit we don't need to fix
>> up the stack and instead follow entry_SYSENTER_32's IRET path directly
>> to xen_iret.
>>
>> We can do the same thing for compat mode even though stack does not need
>> to be fixed. This will allow us to drop usergs_sysret32 paravirt op (in
>> the subsequent patch)
>
> Looks generally quite nice.  Minor comments below:
>
>> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
>> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
>> @@ -308,7 +308,8 @@ sysenter_past_esp:
>>
>>         movl    %esp, %eax
>>         call    do_fast_syscall_32
>> -       testl   %eax, %eax
>> +       /* XEN PV guests always use IRET path */
>> +       ALTERNATIVE "testl %eax, %eax", "xor %eax, %eax", X86_FEATURE_XENPV
>>         jz      .Lsyscall_32_done
>
> Could we make this a little less subtle:
>
> ALTERNATIVE "testl %eax, %eax; lz .Lsyscall_32_done", "jmp
> .Lsyscasll_32_done", X86_FEATURE_XENPV
>
> Borislav, what do you think?
>
> Ditto for the others.

Can you just add !xen_pv_domain() to the opportunistic SYSRET check
instead?  Bury the alternatives in that macro, ie.
static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XENPV).  That would likely benefit other
code as well.

--
Brian Gerst
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/