[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564CF623.40502@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:05:23 -0500
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/xen: Avoid fast syscall path for Xen PV guests
On 11/18/2015 03:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can you just add !xen_pv_domain() to the opportunistic SYSRET check
>> instead? Bury the alternatives in that macro, ie.
>> static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XENPV). That would likely benefit other
>> code as well.
> We could, but that won't help the 64-bit case where we want to keep
> the full asm path.
I don't think I understand what you mean here. Which full asm path?
-boris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists