[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151118221903.GF32672@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:19:03 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
tomi.valkeinen@...com, Sergej Sawazki <ce3a@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: gpio: Get parent clk names already in
of_gpio_clk_setup()
On 11/17, Jyri Sarha wrote:
> Get parent clk names already in of_gpio_clk_setup() and store the
> names in struct clk_gpio_delayed_register_data. of_clk_get_parent_name()
> can not be called in struct of_clk_provider's get() callback since it
> may make a recursive call to of_clk_get_from_provider() and this in turn
> tries to recursively lock of_clk_mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
> Cc: Sergej Sawazki <ce3a@....de>
> ---
> Something has changed in Linux mainline so that getting the clk
> parent names in struct of_clk_provider's get() callback does not work
> anymore. This patch should fix the problem.
Something would be commit 0a4807c2f9a4 (clk: Make
of_clk_get_parent_name() robust with #clock-cells = 1, 2015-10-14)?
The patch looks good. Given that there's one user of this code in
mainline I'll push this as a fix for v4.4.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists