[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564D6FF9.3030105@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:45:13 +0800
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, pi3orama <pi3orama@....com>,
lizefan 00213767 <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling
taken at 'callq' instruction
On 2015/11/19 14:37, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Wangnan (F) <wangnan0@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>>> perf cmdline is
>>>
>>> # ./pref record -g -F 9 --call-graph dwarf ./test_dwarf_unwind
>>>
>>> Use default events, precise_ip == 2 so uses PEBS.
>>>
>> Testetd 'cycles', 'cycles:p' and 'cycles:pp'. Only 'cycles:pp' captures
>> sample at callq. So maybe a PEBS problem?
> Well, that's how our PEBS sampling works: we roll back the instruction pointer to
> point at the instruction generating the sample. The state itself is
> post-instruction.
Just for curiosity:
how the interrupted process continue to execute, when the PC
saved in pt_regs still pointed to 'callq' but SP and stack has
already changes? Do we fix it in kernel, or by hardware?
Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists