[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151119081423.GB16214@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:14:23 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: i915.ko WC writes are slow after ea8596bb2d8d379
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > Although
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/stop_machine.h b/include/linux/stop_machine.h
> > index d2abbdb..ff4f029 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/stop_machine.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/stop_machine.h
> > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static inline int try_stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
> > * grabbing every spinlock (and more). So the "read" side to such a
> > * lock is anything which disables preemption.
> > */
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_STOP_MACHINE) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)
>
> [...]
>
> This seems much better. Having a set of stop_machine functions around
> that don't work depending on config seems dangerous.
Agreed.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists