linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: cache-uniphier: use common API to find the next level cache

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <CAK7LNATkNEr4b5ir57BcYYbJAm6rnS_5Hcui6aG1CCfNp5pvzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Nov 2015 21:22:56 +0900
From:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: cache-uniphier: use common API to find the next
 level cache

It looks like no comment (no interest?) on this patch.
If nobody is opposed to this patch, I will put it into Russell's patch tracker.

2015-11-11 20:47 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>:
> The function uniphier_cache_get_next_level_node() does the same thing
> as of_find_next_cache_node().  Drop the former and stick to the common
> API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> ---
>
>  arch/arm/mm/cache-uniphier.c | 13 +------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-uniphier.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-uniphier.c
> index 0502ba1..a6fa7b7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-uniphier.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-uniphier.c
> @@ -377,17 +377,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id uniphier_cache_match[] __initconst = {
>         { /* sentinel */ }
>  };
>
> -static struct device_node * __init uniphier_cache_get_next_level_node(
> -                                                       struct device_node *np)
> -{
> -       u32 phandle;
> -
> -       if (of_property_read_u32(np, "next-level-cache", &phandle))
> -               return NULL;
> -
> -       return of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle);
> -}
> -
>  static int __init __uniphier_cache_init(struct device_node *np,
>                                         unsigned int *cache_level)
>  {
> @@ -491,7 +480,7 @@ static int __init __uniphier_cache_init(struct device_node *np,
>          * next level cache fails because we want to continue with available
>          * cache levels.
>          */
> -       next_np = uniphier_cache_get_next_level_node(np);
> +       next_np = of_find_next_cache_node(np);
>         if (next_np) {
>                 (*cache_level)++;
>                 ret = __uniphier_cache_init(next_np, cache_level);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives