[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151119084422.5f80250c@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:44:22 -0500
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Yu Fenghua <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] CAT user space interface revisited
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:35:34 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > Well any work on behalf of the important task, should have its cache
> > protected as well (example irq handling threads).
>
> Right, but that's nothing you can do automatically and certainly not
> from a random application.
Right and that's not a problem. For the use-cases CAT is intended to,
manual and per-workload system setup is very common. Things like
thread pinning, hugepages reservation, CPU isolation, nohz_full, etc
require manual setup too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists