linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 4.4 #1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:44:57 +0100
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, <arm@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 4.4 #1

Le 19/11/2015 16:22, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> On Tuesday 17 November 2015 12:35:58 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>>
>> This is the first "fixes" pull-request for AT91. I tried to collect little
>> patches that didn't make it for -rc1.
>> It can be due to synchronization between trees like the addition of some
>> sama5d2 Xplained nodes (MFD tree) or the change of the watchdog compatible
>> string for sama5d4 (watchdog tree).
>> It can also be due to trivial cleanups that were spotted or submitted late like
>> the replacement of "wakeup" properties or removal of unneeded defconfig option.
>> The removal of some dead legacy DT properties or nodes is, in my opinion worth
>> it as well in order to prevent us from abusive cut'n paste.
>> NAND and ISI Atmel MAINTAINERS entries are also updated.
>>
>> Tell me if it's okay for you.
> 
> I'd be happier to get the patches late in the process and then push back
> myself than to get them as fixes, there was really no reason to wait
> for the merge window to end with the ones that you already had.

I thought than having a precise milestone as a base for this
pull-request would be preferred.

> None of the changes look too invasive for -rc2, so I'm taking it anyway,
> but please try to let us know what you have earlier next time, so we
> can get the first fixes into the merge window, or add them as late
> additions on the branches before sending the main pull requests.
> 
> Inter-tree dependencies should never be a reason to send stuff after
> -rc1, let's talk about that before the merge window if you know you
> have those.

Sure, the communication in advance with you would have make all this
easier, sorry for not having done this.

Thanks Arnd. Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/