[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1511200851010.3690@nanos>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:53:34 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Yu Fenghua <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] CAT user space interface revisited
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:09:03AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Marcelo Tosatti wrote
> > > Actually, there is a point that is useful: you might want the important
> > > application to share the L3 portion with HW (that HW DMAs into), and
> > > have only the application and the HW use that region.
> > >
> > > So its a good point that controlling the exact position of the reservation
> > > is important.
> >
> > I'm glad you figured that out yourself. :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > tglx
>
> The HW is a reclaimer of the L3 region shared with HW.
>
> You might want to remove any threads from reclaiming from
> that region.
I might for some threads, but certainly not for those which need to
access DMA buffers. Throwing away 10% of L3 just because you don't
want to deal with it at the interface level is hillarious.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists