linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI: pcie-rcar: Fix OF node passed to MSI irq domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <564EECA9.9070400@arm.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:49:29 +0000
From:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:	Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>
CC:	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: pcie-rcar: Fix OF node passed to MSI irq domain

On 18/11/15 18:01, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> On 16 November 2015 18:31, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 13/11/15 09:36, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> <snip>
>>> Since the stack trace doesn't help that much I added some tracing:
>>> pci_msi_setup_msi_irqs()
>>>   calls pci_msi_get_domain()
>>>     calls dev_get_msi_domain(), gets a non-NULL domain.
>>> pci_msi_setup_msi_irqs()
>>>   calls pci_msi_domain_alloc_irqs()
>>>     calls msi_domain_alloc_irqs()
>>> msi_domain_alloc_irqs:273: ops=ffffffc03193a810
>>> msi_domain_alloc_irqs:274: ops->msi_check=ffffffc031161418
>>> systemd-udevd[1311]: undefined instruction: pc=ffffffc03116141c
>>> That looks to me as though msi_check is off pointing to the weeds.
>>
>> So the next step is to find out who initializes msi_check. Assuming
>> someone does...
> Nothing initializes msi_check... 
> 
>  
>>> By passing a NULL domain into irq_domain_add_linear() you get:
>>> pci_msi_setup_msi_irqs()
>>>   calls pci_msi_get_domain()
>>>     calls dev_get_msi_domain(), gets a NULL domain.
>>>     calls arch_setup_msi_irq()
>>> All ok then.
>>
>> Yes, because you're sidestepping the issue. Any chance you could dig a
>> bit deeper? I'd really like to nail this one down (before we convert
>> your PCI driver to the right API... ;-).
> The problem appears to be that when the pci host driver enables msi
> it calls the following:
> 	msi->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie->dev->of_node, INT_PCI_MSI_NR,
> 					    &msi_domain_ops, &msi->chip);
> The last arg is documented as:
> * @host_data: Controller private data pointer 
> In _irq_domain_add() this ptr is stored in struct irq_domain's host_data.
> 
> However, msi_domain_alloc_irqs() expects host_data to be a ptr to a
> struct msi_domain_info.
> 
> It seems that a number of other pci host drivers do the same, so I am
> surprised that no one else has seen this.

Can you please give this hack a go and let me know if that helps?

Thanks,

	M.

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index 53e4632..7eaa4c8 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static int pci_msi_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
 	struct irq_domain *domain;
 
 	domain = pci_msi_get_domain(dev);
-	if (domain)
+	if (domain && irq_domain_is_hierarchy(domain))
 		return pci_msi_domain_alloc_irqs(domain, dev, nvec, type);
 
 	return arch_setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, type);
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static void pci_msi_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	struct irq_domain *domain;
 
 	domain = pci_msi_get_domain(dev);
-	if (domain)
+	if (domain && irq_domain_is_hierarchy(domain))
 		pci_msi_domain_free_irqs(domain, dev);
 	else
 		arch_teardown_msi_irqs(dev);

-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/