[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4219157.sstthfjICN@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:30:24 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH, once again] regulator: core: avoid unused variable warning
The second argument of the mutex_lock_nested() helper is only
evaluated if CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is set. Otherwise we
get this build warning for the new regulator_lock_supply
function:
drivers/regulator/core.c: In function 'regulator_lock_supply':
drivers/regulator/core.c:142:6: warning: unused variable 'i' [-Wunused-variable]
To avoid the warning, this patch moves the postincrement outside
of the call mutex_lock_nested(), which is enough to shut up
gcc about it.
We had some discussion about changing mutex_lock_nested to an
inline function, which would make the code do the right thing here,
but in the end decided against it, in order to guarantee that
mutex_lock_nested() does not introduced overhead without
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Fixes: 9f01cd4a915 ("regulator: core: introduce function to lock regulators and its supplies")
Link: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2068900
---
The patch that introduced the warning is now in 4.4-rc1, and I think this
patch is still the least ugly workaround we found.
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 4cf1390784e5..cf5371ee0be4 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -142,7 +142,9 @@ static void regulator_lock_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
int i = 0;
while (1) {
- mutex_lock_nested(&rdev->mutex, i++);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&rdev->mutex, i);
+ i++;
+
supply = rdev->supply;
if (!rdev->supply)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists