lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4611580.31jynMWjmL@wuerfel>
Date:	Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:28:02 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, once again] regulator: core: avoid unused variable warning

On Friday 20 November 2015 12:24:00 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:12:00PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 20 November 2015 11:41:27 Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > Can we please at least have a comment explaining that this is working
> > > around lockdep limitations?
> 
> > Not sure which limitation you are referring to. Maybe you could just
> > modify the changelog text as you like when applying the patch?
> 
> > I tried to capture the fact that mutex_lock_nested() intentionally
> > doesn't evaluate its second argument when CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> > is not set, but that appears to be less of a limitation than a
> > choice of the interface.
> 
> That's the limitation (or intereface choice or whatever) that I'm
> talking about - the code looks like a function call so not evaulating
> the second argument is surprising.  I'm looking for something in the
> code rather than the changelog so it doesn't get cleaned up later.
> 

Got it. Will send a new version soon.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ