[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151120014622.GE23310@sejong>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:46:22 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH perf/core 01/13] perf probe: Fix to free temporal
Dwarf_Frame
Hi Masami,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:12:37AM +0000, 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI wrote:
> From: Namhyung Kim [mailto:namhyung@...il.com]
> >On November 19, 2015 7:36:39 AM GMT+09:00, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>Em Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:40:12PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> >>> Since dwarf_cfi_addrframe returns malloc'd Dwarf_Frame
> >>> object, it has to be freed after used.
> >>
> >>Applied to perf/urgent
> >>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c | 9 ++++++---
> >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> >>b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> >>> index 63993d7..4d7d4f4 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> >>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> >>> @@ -683,21 +683,24 @@ static int call_probe_finder(Dwarf_Die *sc_die,
> >>struct probe_finder *pf)
> >>> ret = dwarf_getlocation_addr(&fb_attr, pf->addr, &pf->fb_ops,
> >>&nops, 1);
> >>> if (ret <= 0 || nops == 0) {
> >>> pf->fb_ops = NULL;
> >>> + ret = 0;
> >>> #if _ELFUTILS_PREREQ(0, 142)
> >>> } else if (nops == 1 && pf->fb_ops[0].atom == DW_OP_call_frame_cfa
> >>&&
> >>> pf->cfi != NULL) {
> >>> - Dwarf_Frame *frame;
> >>> + Dwarf_Frame *frame = NULL;
> >>> if (dwarf_cfi_addrframe(pf->cfi, pf->addr, &frame) != 0 ||
> >>> dwarf_frame_cfa(frame, &pf->fb_ops, &nops) != 0) {
> >
> >What if dwarf_cfi_addrframe() succeeded but
> >dwarf_frame_cfa() failed? It seems that the frame
> >still can be leaked..
>
> No, it is also caught by free(). Please see below,
> >
> >>> pr_warning("Failed to get call frame on 0x%jx\n",
> >>> (uintmax_t)pf->addr);
> >>> - return -ENOENT;
> >>> + ret = -ENOENT;
>
> I've replaced "return -ENOENT" with "ret = -ENOENT", so this fall down
Ah, missed that. Thank you.
Namhyung
>
> >>> }
> >>> + free(frame);
>
> and free the frame :) (and if frame == NULL, it is just ignored)
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> >>> #endif
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> /* Call finder's callback handler */
> >>> - ret = pf->callback(sc_die, pf);
> >>> + if (ret >= 0)
> >>> + ret = pf->callback(sc_die, pf);
> >>>
> >>> /* *pf->fb_ops will be cached in libdw. Don't free it. */
> >>> pf->fb_ops = NULL;
> >
> >Hi Arnaldo and Masami,
> >--
> >Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists