linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 00/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Clean up x86's mmu code for future work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <564F43CE.701@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Nov 2015 17:01:18 +0100
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mtosatti@...hat.com, guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Clean up x86's mmu code for
 future work



On 20/11/2015 09:40, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
>   About patch 03: There was a comment on the usage of braces for a single line
>   else-if statement from Xiao. As I answered, checkpatch did not complain about
>   this, and when the corresponding if block has multiple lines, some developers
>   prefer/recommend this style. Feel free to modify it if you don't like it.

I wonder if we can remove the "else if" completely.  Will take a look
after applying, early next week.

> For these three, I'm not sure what we should do now, still RFC?
> We can also consider other approaches, e.g. moving link_shadow_page() in the
> kvm_get_mmu_page() as Paolo suggested before.

I think I will include them in kvm/next.

Thanks,

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/