[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1448039840-11367-1-git-send-email-phil@nwl.cc>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 18:17:16 +0100
From: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tgraf@...g.ch, fengguang.wu@...el.com, wfg@...ux.intel.com,
lkp@...org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] improve fault-tolerance of rhashtable runtime-test
The following series aims to improve lib/test_rhashtable in different
situations:
Patch 1 allows the kernel to reschedule so the test does not block too
long on slow systems.
Patch 2 fixes behaviour under pressure, retrying inserts in non-permanent
error case (-EBUSY).
Patch 3 auto-adjusts the upper table size limit according to the number
of threads (in concurrency test). In fact, the current default is
already too small.
Patch 4 makes it possible to retry inserts even in supposedly permanent
error case (-ENOMEM) to expose rhashtable's remaining problem of
-ENOMEM being not as permanent as it is expected to be.
Changes since v1:
- Introduce insert_retry() which is then used in single-threaded test as
well.
- Do not retry inserts by default if -ENOMEM was returned.
- Rename the retry counter to be a bit more verbose about what it
contains.
- Add patch 4 as a debugging aid.
Phil Sutter (4):
rhashtable-test: add cond_resched() to thread test
rhashtable-test: retry insert operations
rhashtable-test: calculate max_entries value by default
rhashtable-test: allow to retry even if -ENOMEM was returned
lib/test_rhashtable.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
--
2.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists