[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151120172931.GX32017@xsjsorenbubuntu>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:29:31 -0800
From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATH RESEND v2 03/10] tty: xuartps: Always enable transmitter
in start_tx
On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 12:16PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 11:58 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 11:30AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >> On 11/20/2015 10:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 07:13AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >>>> On 11/19/2015 03:02 PM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> >>>>> start_tx must start transmitting characters. Regardless of the state of
> >>>>> the circular buffer, always enable the transmitter hardware.
> >>>>
> >>>> Why?
> >>>>
> >>>> Does cdns_uart_stop_tx() actually stop the transmitter so that
> >>>> data remains in the transmitter?
> >>>
> >>> Well, I saw my system freezing and the cause seemed to be that the UART
> >>> receiver and/or transmitters were disabled while the system was trying
> >>> to print. Hence, I started questioning all locations touching the
> >>> transmitter/receiver enable. I read the docs in
> >>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/serial/driver, which simply
> >>> says "Start transmitting characters." for start_tx(). Hence, I thought,
> >>> this function is probably supposed to just do that and start the
> >>> transmitter. I'll test whether this patch can be dropped.
> >>
> >> I don't think that patch would fix any freeze problems, but restarting
> >> the transmitter even if the circ buffer is empty may be necessary to
> >> push out remaining data when the port is restarted after being stopped.
> >>
> >> IOW, something like
> >>
> >> if (uart_tx_stopped(port))
> >> return;
> >>
> >> ....
> >>
> >>
> >> if (uart_circ_empty(&port->state->xmit)
> >> return;
> >
> > Thanks! I'll change the patch accordingly.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Below is a (work-in-progress) serial driver validation test for flow
> >> control handling (it may need some tuning for slow line speeds).
> >> Usual caveats apply. Takes ~40secs @ 115200.
> >
> > I'll try to get that running on my system.
>
> The test below should pass too, but I know it won't because this xilinx
> driver isn't handling x_char at all.
>
> Aside: does this h/w have rts driver/cts receiver?
I would have to look up the details. But, IIRC, the HW has all the
modem/flow control signals. But on our SoCs those signals are only
available when routing the UART through the FPGA part, which makes it a
rather unlikely configuration since most platforms want the UART as a
low level debug port that should not depend on any FPGA bistreams.
Hence, I suspect it might just be a limitation of the driver.
Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists