[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151120194136.GX3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 20:41:36 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, mhocko@...nel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
will.deacon@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Document Program-Order guarantees
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:21:11PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > Yes, exactly that. Would an unadorned 2 be clearer?
>
> How about "the one issueing the ACQUIRE (smp_cond_acquire)"?
Sure, that works. Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists