| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAGdLNWFiSWQa2HCvD8c_h5_aGYbcXitjqKtqxeDB_wBGsPBSBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:29:09 -0700
From: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@...il.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc: "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fabian Koester <fabian.koester@...ngnow.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] toshiba_acpi: Add WWAN RFKill support
Hi Darren,
2015-11-20 15:50 GMT-07:00 Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:49:25AM -0700, Azael Avalos wrote:
>
> Hi Azael,
>
>> A previuos patch added WWAN support to the driver, allowing to query
>> and set the device status.
>>
>> This patch adds RFKill support for the recently introduced WWAN device,
>> making use of the WWAN and *wireless_status functions to query the
>> killswitch and (de)activate the device accordingly to its status.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabian Koester <fabian.koester@...ngnow.com>
>
> So this is Fabian's code which he sent to you and you are submitting on his
> behalf?
Yes, he sent me the code for review, but made some changes to the
actual code he sent me (mostly patch 01), sent back to him the resulting
changes for testing, and I told him I was gonna submmit the changes :-)
>
>> Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@...il.com>
>
>
> A couple minor nits below.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
>> index 60d1ad9..d1315c5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
>> #include <linux/dmi.h>
>> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>> #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
>> +#include <linux/rfkill.h>
>> #include <linux/toshiba.h>
>> #include <acpi/video.h>
>>
>> @@ -174,6 +175,7 @@ struct toshiba_acpi_dev {
>> struct led_classdev kbd_led;
>> struct led_classdev eco_led;
>> struct miscdevice miscdev;
>> + struct rfkill *wwan_rfk;
>>
>> int force_fan;
>> int last_key_event;
>> @@ -2330,6 +2332,67 @@ static const struct file_operations toshiba_acpi_fops = {
>> };
>>
>> /*
>> + * WWAN RFKill handlers
>> + */
>> +static int toshiba_acpi_wwan_set_block(void *data, bool blocked)
>> +{
>> + struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev = data;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (!dev->killswitch)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + return toshiba_wwan_set(dev, blocked ? 0 : 1);
>
> You can avoid the ternary operation with binary output and just invert the
> bool.
>
> !blocked
OK, will do.
>
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void toshiba_acpi_wwan_poll(struct rfkill *rfkill, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev = data;
>> +
>> + if (toshiba_wireless_status(dev))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct rfkill_ops wwan_rfk_ops = {
>> + .set_block = toshiba_acpi_wwan_set_block,
>> + .poll = toshiba_acpi_wwan_poll,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + int ret = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
>> +
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + dev->wwan_rfk = rfkill_alloc("Toshiba WWAN",
>> + &dev->acpi_dev->dev,
>> + RFKILL_TYPE_WWAN,
>> + &wwan_rfk_ops,
>> + dev);
>> + if (!dev->wwan_rfk) {
>> + pr_err("Unable to allocate WWAN rfkill device\n");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
>> +
>> + ret = rfkill_register(dev->wwan_rfk);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("Unable to register WWAN rfkill device\n");
>> + rfkill_destroy(dev->wwan_rfk);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> * Hotkeys
>> */
>> static int toshiba_acpi_enable_hotkeys(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
>> @@ -2688,6 +2751,11 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
>> if (dev->eco_led_registered)
>> led_classdev_unregister(&dev->eco_led);
>>
>> + if (dev->wwan_rfk) {
>> + rfkill_unregister(dev->wwan_rfk);
>> + rfkill_destroy(dev->wwan_rfk);
>> + }
>> +
>> if (toshiba_acpi)
>> toshiba_acpi = NULL;
>>
>> @@ -2827,6 +2895,8 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
>> dev->fan_supported = !ret;
>>
>> toshiba_wwan_available(dev);
>> + if (dev->wwan_supported)
>> + toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(dev);
>>
>> print_supported_features(dev);
>>
>> @@ -2930,6 +3000,15 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_resume(struct device *device)
>> pr_info("Unable to re-enable hotkeys\n");
>> }
>>
>> + if (dev->wwan_rfk) {
>> + int error = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
>> +
>> + if (error)
>> + return error;
>
> For consistency, please use ret. You can just initialize it to 0 outside the if
> block, use it inside, and return it outside as well. We don't buy much by
> declaring inside the if block on a resume function.
Here "error" was used on the previous if, that's why I chose the same name,
I will rename the variable to "ret" for consistency and adapt the
function on v3.
>
>> +
>> + rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
>> + }
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>> #endif
>> --
>> 2.6.2
>>
>>
>
> --
> Darren Hart
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
Cheers
Azael
--
-- El mundo apesta y vosotros apestais tambien --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists