[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564E899E.4090904@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:46:54 +0800
From: Jike Song <jike.song@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"igvt-g@...1.01.org" <igvt-g@...1.01.org>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"White, Michael L" <michael.l.white@...el.com>,
"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@...el.com>,
"Li, Susie" <susie.li@...el.com>,
"Cowperthwaite, David J" <david.j.cowperthwaite@...el.com>,
"Reddy, Raghuveer" <raghuveer.reddy@...el.com>,
"Zhu, Libo" <libo.zhu@...el.com>,
"Zhou, Chao" <chao.zhou@...el.com>,
"Wang, Hongbo" <hongbo.wang@...el.com>,
"Lv, Zhiyuan" <zhiyuan.lv@...el.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [Announcement] 2015-Q3 release of XenGT - a Mediated
Graphics Passthrough Solution from Intel
On 11/19/2015 07:09 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 19/11/2015 09:40, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>>> But this code should be
>>>> minor to be maintained in libvirt.
>> As far I know libvirt only needs to discover those devices. If they
>> look like sr/iov devices in sysfs this might work without any changes to
>> libvirt.
>
> I don't think they will look like SR/IOV devices.
>
> The interface may look a little like the sysfs interface that GVT-g is
> already using. However, it should at least be extended to support
> multiple vGPUs in a single VM. This might not be possible for Intel
> integrated graphics, but it should definitely be possible for discrete
> graphics cards.
Didn't hear about multiple vGPUs for a single VM before. Yes If we
expect same vGPU interfaces for different vendors, abstraction and
vendor specific stuff should be implemented.
> Another nit is that the VM id should probably be replaced by a UUID
> (because it's too easy to stumble on an existing VM id), assuming a VM
> id is needed at all.
For the last assumption, yes, a VM id is not necessary for gvt-g, it's
only a temporary implementation.
As long as libvirt is used, UUID should be enough for gvt-g. However,
UUID is not mandatory? What should we do if user don't specify an UUID
in QEMU cmdline?
>
> Paolo
>
--
Thanks,
Jike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists