[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564FB11A.3020906@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:47:38 -0800
From: santosh shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
To: Michal Morawiec <michal.morawiec@...to.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michal Morawiec <michal.1.morawiec.ext@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Fix linking RAM setup for
queue managers
On 11/20/2015 3:39 PM, Michal Morawiec wrote:
> Configure linking RAM for both queue managers also in case
> when only linking RAM 0 is specified in device tree.
>
why ?
> Signed-off-by: Michal Morawiec <michal.1.morawiec.ext@...ia.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
> index 6d8646d..a809c30 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
> @@ -1173,7 +1173,7 @@ static int knav_queue_setup_link_ram(struct knav_device *kdev)
>
> block++;
> if (!block->size)
> - return 0;
> + continue;
>
You have to expand this a bit for me. Because you really don't
want kernel code to run the configuration on hardware which doesn't
exist. I mean device tree suppose to specify the linking RAM for both
QMs unless and until there is a reason not too.
Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists