lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:12:10 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To:	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] loop: Enable correct physical blocksize

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de> wrote:
> When running on files the physical blocksize is actually 4k,
> so we should be announcing it as such. This is enabled with
> a new LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE flag value to the existing
> loop_set_status ioctl.

LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE is defined in patch 3/4, and you use
it too early in patch 1/4.

>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
> ---
>  drivers/block/loop.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index 423f4ca..e790487 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -233,6 +233,8 @@ figure_loop_size(struct loop_device *lo, loff_t offset, loff_t sizelimit)
>                 lo->lo_offset = offset;
>         if (lo->lo_sizelimit != sizelimit)
>                 lo->lo_sizelimit = sizelimit;
> +       if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE)
> +               blk_queue_physical_block_size(lo->lo_queue, lo->lo_blocksize);
>         set_capacity(lo->lo_disk, x);
>         bd_set_size(bdev, (loff_t)get_capacity(bdev->bd_disk) << 9);
>         /* let user-space know about the new size */
> @@ -1092,6 +1094,7 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
>         int err;
>         struct loop_func_table *xfer;
>         kuid_t uid = current_uid();
> +       int lo_flags = lo->lo_flags;
>
>         if (lo->lo_encrypt_key_size &&
>             !uid_eq(lo->lo_key_owner, uid) &&
> @@ -1121,8 +1124,12 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
>         if (err)
>                 return err;
>
> +       if (info->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE)
> +               lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE;
> +
>         if (lo->lo_offset != info->lo_offset ||
> -           lo->lo_sizelimit != info->lo_sizelimit)
> +           lo->lo_sizelimit != info->lo_sizelimit ||
> +           lo->lo_flags != lo_flags)
>                 if (figure_loop_size(lo, info->lo_offset, info->lo_sizelimit))
>                         return -EFBIG;
>
> --
> 1.8.5.6
>



-- 
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists