linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce: Make usable address checks Intel-only

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151121191817.GD15172@pd.tnic>
Date:	Sat, 21 Nov 2015 20:18:17 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:	"Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce: Make usable address checks Intel-only

From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 19:52:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce: Make usable address checks Intel-only

The MCi_MISC bitfield definitions mce_usable_address() checks are
Intel-only. Make them so.

While at it, move mce_usable_address() up, before all its callers and
get rid of the forward declaration.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index e00e85ab7387..3865e95cc5ec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -114,7 +114,6 @@ static struct work_struct mce_work;
 static struct irq_work mce_irq_work;
 
 static void (*quirk_no_way_out)(int bank, struct mce *m, struct pt_regs *regs);
-static int mce_usable_address(struct mce *m);
 
 /*
  * CPU/chipset specific EDAC code can register a notifier call here to print
@@ -475,6 +474,28 @@ static void mce_report_event(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	irq_work_queue(&mce_irq_work);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Check if the address reported by the CPU is in a format we can parse.
+ * It would be possible to add code for most other cases, but all would
+ * be somewhat complicated (e.g. segment offset would require an instruction
+ * parser). So only support physical addresses up to page granuality for now.
+ */
+static int mce_usable_address(struct mce *m)
+{
+	if (!(m->status & MCI_STATUS_MISCV) || !(m->status & MCI_STATUS_ADDRV))
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Checks after this one are Intel-specific: */
+	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
+		return 1;
+
+	if (MCI_MISC_ADDR_LSB(m->misc) > PAGE_SHIFT)
+		return 0;
+	if (MCI_MISC_ADDR_MODE(m->misc) != MCI_MISC_ADDR_PHYS)
+		return 0;
+	return 1;
+}
+
 static int srao_decode_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
 				void *data)
 {
@@ -930,23 +951,6 @@ reset:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-/*
- * Check if the address reported by the CPU is in a format we can parse.
- * It would be possible to add code for most other cases, but all would
- * be somewhat complicated (e.g. segment offset would require an instruction
- * parser). So only support physical addresses up to page granuality for now.
- */
-static int mce_usable_address(struct mce *m)
-{
-	if (!(m->status & MCI_STATUS_MISCV) || !(m->status & MCI_STATUS_ADDRV))
-		return 0;
-	if (MCI_MISC_ADDR_LSB(m->misc) > PAGE_SHIFT)
-		return 0;
-	if (MCI_MISC_ADDR_MODE(m->misc) != MCI_MISC_ADDR_PHYS)
-		return 0;
-	return 1;
-}
-
 static void mce_clear_state(unsigned long *toclear)
 {
 	int i;
-- 
2.3.5

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/