[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564FC186.5010608@broadcom.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:57:42 -0800
From: Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Simran Rai <ssimran@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: iproc: Add support for Cygnus audio clocks
On 11/20/2015 4:21 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 11/18, Ray Jui wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc.h b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc.h
>> index 8988de7..e2a7748 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc.h
>> @@ -194,5 +215,11 @@ void __init iproc_asiu_setup(struct device_node *node,
>> const struct iproc_asiu_div *div,
>> const struct iproc_asiu_gate *gate,
>> unsigned int num_clks);
>> +void __init iproc_audiopll_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
>> + const struct iproc_pll_ctrl *pll_ctrl,
>> + const struct iproc_pll_vco_param *vco,
>> + unsigned int num_vco_entries,
>> + const struct iproc_clk_ctrl *clk_ctrl,
>> + unsigned int num_clks);
>
> We don't need __init in header files. And is this even used or
> defined anywhere?
>
Does it make more sense if I add an incremental patch to remove all of
the __init in this header?
Ah, this is a mistake. cygnus_audiopll_clk_init is already defined in
clk-cygnus.c and is meant to call iproc_pll_clk_setup to set up the
clock. iproc_pll_clk_setup is already declared in this header.
iproc_audiopll_clk_setup should be removed here.
Thanks,
Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists