linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] ARM: Use udiv/sdiv for __aeabi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6840047.0HF9qAEq6r@wuerfel>
Date:	Sun, 22 Nov 2015 20:25:27 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
Cc:	Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] ARM: Use udiv/sdiv for __aeabi_{u}idiv library functions

On Sunday 22 November 2015 13:29:29 Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 21 November 2015 at 23:21, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > Regarding PJ4, it's still unclear whether that has the same
> > problem and it only reports idivt when it actually supports idiva,
> > or whether the lack of idiva support on PJ4 is instead the reason
> > why the ARM ARM was updated to have separate flags.
> 
> SDIV/IDIV were originally introduced for R and M profile only
> and there the Thumb encodings of SDIV/IDIV are mandatory
> whereas the ARM ones are optional (and weren't initially
> defined at all). So if you're looking for CPUs with only the
> Thumb encodings I would try checking older R profile cores
> like the Cortex-R4.

The question is really about Marvell Dove, MMP and Armada 370,
which are all based on PJ4 or PJ4B (CPU part : 0x581), so ARMv7-A
and report idivt support but idiva.

There are a couple of explanations here:

a) Marvell really implemented only idivt but not idiva
   and reports it correctly, and the people from
   https://groups.google.com/a/dartlang.org/forum/#!topic/reviews/9wvsJvq0YYY
   just misinterpreted the flags

b) the dartlag.org folks are correct, and it supports neither
   idivt nor idiva, and the /proc/cpuinfo flag is just wrong
   and requires a fixup

c) like Krait, it actually implements both idiva and idivt but
   gets the reporting wrong.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/