[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151123081235.GA23661@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:12:35 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch: consolidate CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM in
lib/Kconfig.debug
* Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> Let all the archs that implement CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM use a common
> definition in lib/Kconfig.debug.
For the x86 bit:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Note, the 'depends on !SPARC' is due to sparc not implementing
> devmem_is_allowed().
Maybe that should be converted into a helper Kconfig switch for architectures to
opt in to /dev/mem restrictions?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists