[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <565309D5.80707@bmw-carit.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:43:01 +0100
From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<pablo@...filter.org>, <kaber@...sh.net>,
<kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
<nhorman@...driver.co>
CC: <lizefan@...wei.com>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
<coreteam@...filter.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
<ninasc@...com>, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] netfilter: implement xt_cgroup cgroup2 path match
Hi Tejun,
On 11/21/2015 05:14 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:> +static int
> cgroup_mt_check_v1(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
> +{
> + struct xt_cgroup_info_v1 *info = par->matchinfo;
> + struct cgroup *cgrp;
> +
> + if ((info->invert_path & ~1) || (info->invert_classid & ~1))
> + return -EINVAL;
The checks below use pr_info() in case the configuration is not valid.
Is this missing here on purpose?
I have tested it slightly and it seems to work (also on an older
kernel). I don't know if that qualifies it for a Tested-by but at least
Acked-by should do the trick:
Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Acked-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
cheers,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists