[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151123141918.GB3587@lerouge>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:19:19 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] cputime: Introduce vtime accounting check for readers
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 09:28:28PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 04:47:33PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > +++ b/include/linux/vtime.h
> > @@ -17,9 +17,20 @@ static inline bool vtime_accounting_cpu_enabled(void) { return true; }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE */
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
> > +/*
> > + * Checks if vtime is enabled on some CPU. Cputime readers want to be careful
> > + * in that case and compute the tickless cputime.
> > + * For now vtime state is tied to context tracking. We might want to decouple
> > + * those later if necessary.
> > + */
> > +static inline bool vtime_accounting_enabled(void)
> > +{
> > + return context_tracking_is_enabled();
> > +}
>
> Should this not also include a definition of this function for
> CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE and CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING ?
I could but I haven't found any user of it yet for others than
CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN. The NATIVE version, when enabled, runs on
all CPUs anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists