linux-kernel - Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:35:11 +0100
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:	Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kbuild-all@...org, jianchuan.wang@...driver.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, yang.shi@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore
 migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest

On 11/23/2015 03:14 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:

>> Need to add RT in the subject like "[PATCH RT]". Then perhaps Fengguang
>> can have his tests either ignore these or test against the -rt trees.
> 
> Yes sure. Shall I apply RT patches to this tree/branch?
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-4.1.y-rt

I'm going to get you your kbot branch where you run bisect tests and
everything and tests the patches against. The problem with this one is
that we will drop it (or leave it stale) once we move to the next major
kernel release.

> Thanks,
> Fengguang

Sebastian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/