[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5653241F.4070704@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:35:11 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kbuild-all@...org, jianchuan.wang@...driver.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, yang.shi@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore
migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest
On 11/23/2015 03:14 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> Need to add RT in the subject like "[PATCH RT]". Then perhaps Fengguang
>> can have his tests either ignore these or test against the -rt trees.
>
> Yes sure. Shall I apply RT patches to this tree/branch?
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-4.1.y-rt
I'm going to get you your kbot branch where you run bisect tests and
everything and tests the patches against. The problem with this one is
that we will drop it (or leave it stale) once we move to the next major
kernel release.
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists