lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <565325CD.30608@atmel.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:42:21 +0100
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	<vinod.koul@...el.com>
CC:	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: at_xdmac: fix spurious flag status for
 mem2mem transfers

Le 23/11/2015 14:09, Ludovic Desroches a écrit :
> When setting the channel configuration register, the perid field is not
> set to 0 since it is useless for mem2mem transfers. Unfortunately, a
> device has 0 as perid. It could cause spurious flags status because
> the controller could mix some events from the two channels.
> For that reason, use the highest perid value for mem2mem transfers since it
> doesn't match the perid of other devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>

Indeed: thanks Ludovic:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>

> ---
>  drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> index d09277f..b90e62f 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> @@ -863,8 +863,12 @@ at_xdmac_interleaved_queue_desc(struct dma_chan *chan,
>  	 * access. Hopefully we can access DDR through both ports (at least on
>  	 * SAMA5D4x), so we can use the same interface for source and dest,
>  	 * that solves the fact we don't know the direction.
> +	 * ERRATA: Even if useless for memory transfers, the PERID has to not
> +	 * match the one of another channel. If not, it could lead to spurious
> +	 * flag status.
>  	 */
> -	u32			chan_cc = AT_XDMAC_CC_DIF(0)
> +	u32			chan_cc = AT_XDMAC_CC_PERID(0x3f)
> +					| AT_XDMAC_CC_DIF(0)
>  					| AT_XDMAC_CC_SIF(0)
>  					| AT_XDMAC_CC_MBSIZE_SIXTEEN
>  					| AT_XDMAC_CC_TYPE_MEM_TRAN;
> @@ -1039,8 +1043,12 @@ at_xdmac_prep_dma_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dest, dma_addr_t src,
>  	 * access DDR through both ports (at least on SAMA5D4x), so we can use
>  	 * the same interface for source and dest, that solves the fact we
>  	 * don't know the direction.
> +	 * ERRATA: Even if useless for memory transfers, the PERID has to not
> +	 * match the one of another channel. If not, it could lead to spurious
> +	 * flag status.
>  	 */
> -	u32			chan_cc = AT_XDMAC_CC_DAM_INCREMENTED_AM
> +	u32			chan_cc = AT_XDMAC_CC_PERID(0x3f)
> +					| AT_XDMAC_CC_DAM_INCREMENTED_AM
>  					| AT_XDMAC_CC_SAM_INCREMENTED_AM
>  					| AT_XDMAC_CC_DIF(0)
>  					| AT_XDMAC_CC_SIF(0)
> @@ -1140,8 +1148,12 @@ static struct at_xdmac_desc *at_xdmac_memset_create_desc(struct dma_chan *chan,
>  	 * access. Hopefully we can access DDR through both ports (at least on
>  	 * SAMA5D4x), so we can use the same interface for source and dest,
>  	 * that solves the fact we don't know the direction.
> +	 * ERRATA: Even if useless for memory transfers, the PERID has to not
> +	 * match the one of another channel. If not, it could lead to spurious
> +	 * flag status.
>  	 */
> -	u32			chan_cc = AT_XDMAC_CC_DAM_UBS_AM
> +	u32			chan_cc = AT_XDMAC_CC_PERID(0x3f)
> +					| AT_XDMAC_CC_DAM_UBS_AM
>  					| AT_XDMAC_CC_SAM_INCREMENTED_AM
>  					| AT_XDMAC_CC_DIF(0)
>  					| AT_XDMAC_CC_SIF(0)
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ