| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-03e01f568759ddbfdaff892e299758e7771a3478@git.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:06:56 -0800
From: tip-bot for Wang Nan <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: hpa@...or.com, ast@...nel.org, lizefan@...wei.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
mingo@...nel.org, acme@...hat.com, wangnan0@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf bpf:
Allow BPF program config probing options
Commit-ID: 03e01f568759ddbfdaff892e299758e7771a3478
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/03e01f568759ddbfdaff892e299758e7771a3478
Author: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:10:08 +0000
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:51:04 -0300
perf bpf: Allow BPF program config probing options
By extending the syntax of BPF object section names, this patch allows users to
config probing options like what they can do in 'perf probe'.
The error message in 'perf probe' is also updated.
Test result:
For following BPF file test_probe_glob.c:
# cat test_probe_glob.c
__attribute__((section("inlines=no;func=SyS_dup?"), used))
int func(void *ctx)
{
return 1;
}
char _license[] __attribute__((section("license"), used)) = "GPL";
int _version __attribute__((section("version"), used)) = 0x40300;
#
# ./perf record -e ./test_probe_glob.c ls /
...
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.013 MB perf.data ]
# ./perf evlist
perf_bpf_probe:func_1
perf_bpf_probe:func
After changing "inlines=no" to "inlines=yes":
# ./perf record -e ./test_probe_glob.c ls /
...
[ perf record: Woken up 2 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.013 MB perf.data ]
# ./perf evlist
perf_bpf_probe:func_3
perf_bpf_probe:func_2
perf_bpf_probe:func_1
perf_bpf_probe:func
Then test 'force':
Use following program:
# cat test_probe_force.c
__attribute__((section("func=sys_write"), used))
int funca(void *ctx)
{
return 1;
}
__attribute__((section("force=yes;func=sys_write"), used))
int funcb(void *ctx)
{
return 1;
}
char _license[] __attribute__((section("license"), used)) = "GPL";
int _version __attribute__((section("version"), used)) = 0x40300;
#
# perf record -e ./test_probe_force.c usleep 1
Error: event "func" already exists.
Hint: Remove existing event by 'perf probe -d'
or force duplicates by 'perf probe -f'
or set 'force=yes' in BPF source.
event syntax error: './test_probe_force.c'
\___ Probe point exist. Try 'perf probe -d "*"' and set 'force=yes'
(add -v to see detail)
...
Then replace 'force=no' to 'force=yes':
# vim test_probe_force.c
# perf record -e ./test_probe_force.c usleep 1
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.017 MB perf.data ]
# perf evlist
perf_bpf_probe:func_1
perf_bpf_probe:func
#
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc: pi3orama@....com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1447675815-166222-7-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 7 ++++--
2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
index d0f02ed..98f2e5d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
#include "perf.h"
#include "debug.h"
#include "bpf-loader.h"
@@ -129,6 +130,38 @@ config__module(const char *value, struct perf_probe_event *pev)
return 0;
}
+static int
+config__bool(const char *value,
+ bool *pbool, bool invert)
+{
+ int err;
+ bool bool_value;
+
+ if (!pbool)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ err = strtobool(value, &bool_value);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ *pbool = invert ? !bool_value : bool_value;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+config__inlines(const char *value,
+ struct perf_probe_event *pev __maybe_unused)
+{
+ return config__bool(value, &probe_conf.no_inlines, true);
+}
+
+static int
+config__force(const char *value,
+ struct perf_probe_event *pev __maybe_unused)
+{
+ return config__bool(value, &probe_conf.force_add, false);
+}
+
static struct {
const char *key;
const char *usage;
@@ -146,7 +179,19 @@ static struct {
.usage = "module=<module name> ",
.desc = "Set kprobe module",
.func = config__module,
- }
+ },
+ {
+ .key = "inlines",
+ .usage = "inlines=[yes|no] ",
+ .desc = "Probe at inline symbol",
+ .func = config__inlines,
+ },
+ {
+ .key = "force",
+ .usage = "force=[yes|no] ",
+ .desc = "Forcibly add events with existing name",
+ .func = config__force,
+ },
};
static int
@@ -240,6 +285,10 @@ config_bpf_program(struct bpf_program *prog)
const char *config_str;
int err;
+ /* Initialize per-program probing setting */
+ probe_conf.no_inlines = false;
+ probe_conf.force_add = false;
+
config_str = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
if (IS_ERR(config_str)) {
pr_debug("bpf: unable to get title for program\n");
@@ -544,7 +593,7 @@ int bpf__strerror_probe(struct bpf_object *obj __maybe_unused,
scnprintf(buf, size, "%s (add -v to see detail)", emsg);
break;
}
- bpf__strerror_entry(EEXIST, "Probe point exist. Try use 'perf probe -d \"*\"'");
+ bpf__strerror_entry(EEXIST, "Probe point exist. Try 'perf probe -d \"*\"' and set 'force=yes'");
bpf__strerror_entry(EACCES, "You need to be root");
bpf__strerror_entry(EPERM, "You need to be root, and /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict should be 0");
bpf__strerror_entry(ENOENT, "You need to check probing points in BPF file");
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
index 03875f9..93996ec 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
@@ -2326,8 +2326,11 @@ static int get_new_event_name(char *buf, size_t len, const char *base,
goto out;
if (!allow_suffix) {
- pr_warning("Error: event \"%s\" already exists. "
- "(Use -f to force duplicates.)\n", buf);
+ pr_warning("Error: event \"%s\" already exists.\n"
+ " Hint: Remove existing event by 'perf probe -d'\n"
+ " or force duplicates by 'perf probe -f'\n"
+ " or set 'force=yes' in BPF source.\n",
+ buf);
ret = -EEXIST;
goto out;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists