[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4150271.zrLzq08T60@wuerfel>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:52:38 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
josh@...htriplett.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] asm-generic: default BUG_ON(x) to "if(x) BUG()"
On Monday 23 November 2015 16:37:50 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:33:59PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > I think you could do better by simply calling panic("BUG!") instead as
> > BUG() does. It will avoid the printk() call and pushing the file/line
> > number onto the stack. It will also probably not inflate the rodata this
> > way.
>
> Does that not depend on the architectures BUG() implementation? If an
> architecture implements it as a signalling illegal instruction and a
> lookup table, changing it to be a panic() would probably be more code.
Correct, overall, we are down to a 1.40% size reduction compared to
1.70% without my patch and 1.49% with my version:
section CONFIG_BUG=y CONFIG_BUG=n CONFIG_BUG=n+patch panic("BUG!")
.text 8320248 | 8180944 | 8207688 | 8221848
.rodata 3633720 | 3567144 | 3570648 | 3567344
__bug_table 32508 | --- | --- | ---
__modver 692 | 1584 | 2176 | 1384
.init.text 558132 | 548300 | 550088 | 550592
.exit.text 12380 | 12256 | 12380 | 12448
.data 1016672 | 1016064 | 1016128 | 1016064
Total 14622556 | 14374510 | 14407326 | 14417898
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists