[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151123.123821.1971816203199981831.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:38:21 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: phil@....cc
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tgraf@...g.ch, fengguang.wu@...el.com, wfg@...ux.intel.com,
lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] improve fault-tolerance of rhashtable
runtime-test
From: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 18:17:16 +0100
> The following series aims to improve lib/test_rhashtable in different
> situations:
>
> Patch 1 allows the kernel to reschedule so the test does not block too
> long on slow systems.
> Patch 2 fixes behaviour under pressure, retrying inserts in non-permanent
> error case (-EBUSY).
> Patch 3 auto-adjusts the upper table size limit according to the number
> of threads (in concurrency test). In fact, the current default is
> already too small.
> Patch 4 makes it possible to retry inserts even in supposedly permanent
> error case (-ENOMEM) to expose rhashtable's remaining problem of
> -ENOMEM being not as permanent as it is expected to be.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Introduce insert_retry() which is then used in single-threaded test as
> well.
> - Do not retry inserts by default if -ENOMEM was returned.
> - Rename the retry counter to be a bit more verbose about what it
> contains.
> - Add patch 4 as a debugging aid.
Series applied, thanks Phil.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists