| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20151124055423.GA31611@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:54:23 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: tatsu@...jp.nec.com, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: net: Generalise wq_has_sleeper helper
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 05:48:29PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> BTW, the networking folks found this years ago and even added
> helpers to deal with this. See for example wq_has_sleeper in
> include/net/sock.h. It would be good if we can move some of
> those helpers into wait.h instead.
Here is a patch against net-next which makes the wq_has_sleeper
helper available to non-next users:
---8<---
The memory barrier in the helper wq_has_sleeper is needed by just
about every user of waitqueue_active. This patch generalises it
by making it take a wait_queue_head_t directly. The existing
helper is renamed to skwq_has_sleeper.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
diff --git a/crypto/algif_aead.c b/crypto/algif_aead.c
index 0aa6fdf..fb99f30 100644
--- a/crypto/algif_aead.c
+++ b/crypto/algif_aead.c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static void aead_wmem_wakeup(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, POLLIN |
POLLRDNORM |
POLLRDBAND);
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static void aead_data_wakeup(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, POLLOUT |
POLLRDNORM |
POLLRDBAND);
diff --git a/crypto/algif_skcipher.c b/crypto/algif_skcipher.c
index af31a0e..0e6702e 100644
--- a/crypto/algif_skcipher.c
+++ b/crypto/algif_skcipher.c
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static void skcipher_wmem_wakeup(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, POLLIN |
POLLRDNORM |
POLLRDBAND);
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static void skcipher_data_wakeup(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, POLLOUT |
POLLRDNORM |
POLLRDBAND);
diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h
index 1e1bf9f..bd1157f 100644
--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -107,6 +107,50 @@ static inline int waitqueue_active(wait_queue_head_t *q)
return !list_empty(&q->task_list);
}
+/**
+ * wq_has_sleeper - check if there are any waiting processes
+ * @wq: wait queue head
+ *
+ * Returns true if wq has waiting processes
+ *
+ * The purpose of the wq_has_sleeper and sock_poll_wait is to wrap the memory
+ * barrier call. They were added due to the race found within the tcp code.
+ *
+ * Consider following tcp code paths:
+ *
+ * CPU1 CPU2
+ *
+ * sys_select receive packet
+ * ... ...
+ * __add_wait_queue update tp->rcv_nxt
+ * ... ...
+ * tp->rcv_nxt check sock_def_readable
+ * ... {
+ * schedule rcu_read_lock();
+ * wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
+ * if (wq && waitqueue_active(&wq->wait))
+ * wake_up_interruptible(&wq->wait)
+ * ...
+ * }
+ *
+ * The race for tcp fires when the __add_wait_queue changes done by CPU1 stay
+ * in its cache, and so does the tp->rcv_nxt update on CPU2 side. The CPU1
+ * could then endup calling schedule and sleep forever if there are no more
+ * data on the socket.
+ *
+ */
+static inline bool wq_has_sleeper(wait_queue_head_t *wq)
+{
+ /* We need to be sure we are in sync with the
+ * add_wait_queue modifications to the wait queue.
+ *
+ * This memory barrier should be paired with one on the
+ * waiting side.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+ return waitqueue_active(wq);
+}
+
extern void add_wait_queue(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait);
extern void add_wait_queue_exclusive(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait);
extern void remove_wait_queue(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait);
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index bbf7c2c..4a6e9b6 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
#include <linux/static_key.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <linux/rculist_nulls.h>
@@ -1879,46 +1880,14 @@ static inline bool sk_has_allocations(const struct sock *sk)
}
/**
- * wq_has_sleeper - check if there are any waiting processes
+ * skwq_has_sleeper - check if there are any waiting processes
* @wq: struct socket_wq
*
* Returns true if socket_wq has waiting processes
- *
- * The purpose of the wq_has_sleeper and sock_poll_wait is to wrap the memory
- * barrier call. They were added due to the race found within the tcp code.
- *
- * Consider following tcp code paths:
- *
- * CPU1 CPU2
- *
- * sys_select receive packet
- * ... ...
- * __add_wait_queue update tp->rcv_nxt
- * ... ...
- * tp->rcv_nxt check sock_def_readable
- * ... {
- * schedule rcu_read_lock();
- * wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- * if (wq && waitqueue_active(&wq->wait))
- * wake_up_interruptible(&wq->wait)
- * ...
- * }
- *
- * The race for tcp fires when the __add_wait_queue changes done by CPU1 stay
- * in its cache, and so does the tp->rcv_nxt update on CPU2 side. The CPU1
- * could then endup calling schedule and sleep forever if there are no more
- * data on the socket.
- *
*/
-static inline bool wq_has_sleeper(struct socket_wq *wq)
+static inline bool skwq_has_sleeper(struct socket_wq *wq)
{
- /* We need to be sure we are in sync with the
- * add_wait_queue modifications to the wait queue.
- *
- * This memory barrier is paired in the sock_poll_wait.
- */
- smp_mb();
- return wq && waitqueue_active(&wq->wait);
+ return wq && wq_has_sleeper(&wq->wait);
}
/**
diff --git a/net/atm/common.c b/net/atm/common.c
index 49a872d..6dc1230 100644
--- a/net/atm/common.c
+++ b/net/atm/common.c
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static void vcc_def_wakeup(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up(&wq->wait);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static void vcc_write_space(struct sock *sk)
if (vcc_writable(sk)) {
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible(&wq->wait);
sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 1e4dd54..2769bd3a 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -2283,7 +2283,7 @@ static void sock_def_wakeup(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_all(&wq->wait);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -2294,7 +2294,7 @@ static void sock_def_error_report(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_poll(&wq->wait, POLLERR);
sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_IO, POLL_ERR);
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -2306,7 +2306,7 @@ static void sock_def_readable(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, POLLIN | POLLPRI |
POLLRDNORM | POLLRDBAND);
sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN);
@@ -2324,7 +2324,7 @@ static void sock_def_write_space(struct sock *sk)
*/
if ((atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) << 1) <= sk->sk_sndbuf) {
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, POLLOUT |
POLLWRNORM | POLLWRBAND);
diff --git a/net/core/stream.c b/net/core/stream.c
index d70f77a..8ff9d63 100644
--- a/net/core/stream.c
+++ b/net/core/stream.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void sk_stream_write_space(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_poll(&wq->wait, POLLOUT |
POLLWRNORM | POLLWRBAND);
if (wq && wq->fasync_list && !(sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN))
diff --git a/net/dccp/output.c b/net/dccp/output.c
index 4ce912e..b66c84d 100644
--- a/net/dccp/output.c
+++ b/net/dccp/output.c
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ void dccp_write_space(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible(&wq->wait);
/* Should agree with poll, otherwise some programs break */
if (sock_writeable(sk))
diff --git a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
index fcb2752..4f0aa91 100644
--- a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
+++ b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ static void iucv_sock_wake_msglim(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_all(&wq->wait);
sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
rcu_read_unlock();
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
index 1f8a144..7e2d105 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static void rxrpc_write_space(struct sock *sk)
if (rxrpc_writable(sk)) {
struct socket_wq *wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible(&wq->wait);
sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
}
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 897c01c..ec10b66 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -6978,7 +6978,7 @@ void sctp_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, POLLIN |
POLLRDNORM | POLLRDBAND);
sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN);
diff --git a/net/tipc/socket.c b/net/tipc/socket.c
index 552dbab..525acf6 100644
--- a/net/tipc/socket.c
+++ b/net/tipc/socket.c
@@ -1492,7 +1492,7 @@ static void tipc_write_space(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, POLLOUT |
POLLWRNORM | POLLWRBAND);
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -1509,7 +1509,7 @@ static void tipc_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, POLLIN |
POLLRDNORM | POLLRDBAND);
rcu_read_unlock();
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index aaa0b58..0446ff1 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static void unix_write_space(struct sock *sk)
rcu_read_lock();
if (unix_writable(sk)) {
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
- if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
+ if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait,
POLLOUT | POLLWRNORM | POLLWRBAND);
sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists