[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151124073639.GA3785@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 08:36:39 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [UNTESTED PATCH] x86, mce: Avoid double entry of deferred errors
into the genpool.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:19:18AM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Also, two more fixes I've done while injecting in a kvm guest I'm
> > sending as a reply to this message. Will inject on a real box too.
>
> Ok ... applied those two on top of my "UNTESTED" patch and injected an error to force a UCNA log.
Ok, what error type is that in EINJ nomenclature? I had only
/sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj/available_error_type:0x00000002 Processor Uncorrectable non-fatal
/sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj/available_error_type:0x00000008 Memory Correctable
/sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj/available_error_type:0x00000010 Memory Uncorrectable non-fatal
and I would've guessed it is the 0x10 type, i.e., the memory
uncorrectable which is non-fatal - assuming here - but that one got
promoted to a #MC on my box.
The processor uncorrectable didn't want to inject due to missing EINJ
instruction 0x5 or so...
> Everything looked ok. Just one copy on the console and in
> /var/log/mcelog (actually logs from bank7 and bank3 ... but that was
> expected from this test).
Good.
> So my patch is tested, and take this
>
> Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com> for your two additional patches.
Thanks!
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists